Fast & fed in one study (alternative) [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-03-05 12:50 (1534 d 19:04 ago) – Posting: # 21206
Views: 3,085

Hi Shuanghe,

❝ What happens if T is BE to R under fasting and fed but T has much more food effect than R? Will "nice-to-know" become "but-now-I-know-so-you-are-fucked"?


By “much more” you mean that the 90% CI is entirely outside the 80-125% limits, right? This means only that you have to forget the idea of a hybrid application.
Everything else (CI overlapping the limits) is indecisive and would not worry me. Even if you are completely outside (T demonstrated a larger food effect than R) – since both fasting and fed passed BE – stay with the generic pathway and you should be fine.

❝ What's your experience from regulation perspective?


Nil – also for the “nice” case. Though the EMA stated in various conferences to welcome such a hybrid application, I haven’t seen one so far. Any experience from the members?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,029 posts in 4,834 threads, 1,641 registered users;
33 visitors (0 registered, 33 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The most erroneous stories are those we think we know best–
and therefore never scrutinize or question.    Stephen Jay Gould

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5