Orange or citrus flavor [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-02-20 09:41 (247 d 02:52 ago) – Posting: # 21183
Views: 856

Hi Dr_Dan,


it is a tricky question. On whom is the burden of proof here?

I would perhaps try and argue that since the excipient is common, used for decades, generally allowed and since PRAC and CHMP and SWP and so forth did not in any way indicate the need for a review of safety/potential toxicity etc., the excipient should be considered ok.
At the end of the day the purpose of the regulatory mechanisms is to capture those things since they have access to much more info then you/we have. Their analysis is potentially much more sensitive than anything you can look into or speculate into.

Absence of evidence vs evidence of absence...

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 13:33 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5