Orange or citrus flavor [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2020-02-20 09:41 (221 d 05:25 ago) – Posting: # 21183
Views: 842

Hi Dr_Dan,

it is a tricky question. On whom is the burden of proof here?

I would perhaps try and argue that since the excipient is common, used for decades, generally allowed and since PRAC and CHMP and SWP and so forth did not in any way indicate the need for a review of safety/potential toxicity etc., the excipient should be considered ok.
At the end of the day the purpose of the regulatory mechanisms is to capture those things since they have access to much more info then you/we have. Their analysis is potentially much more sensitive than anything you can look into or speculate into.

Absence of evidence vs evidence of absence...

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,082 posts in 4,397 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 16:06 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz