Orange or citrus flavor [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-02-20 10:41 (1948 d 06:56 ago) – Posting: # 21183
Views: 2,323

Hi Dr_Dan,


it is a tricky question. On whom is the burden of proof here?

I would perhaps try and argue that since the excipient is common, used for decades, generally allowed and since PRAC and CHMP and SWP and so forth did not in any way indicate the need for a review of safety/potential toxicity etc., the excipient should be considered ok.
At the end of the day the purpose of the regulatory mechanisms is to capture those things since they have access to much more info then you/we have. Their analysis is potentially much more sensitive than anything you can look into or speculate into.

Absence of evidence vs evidence of absence...

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
56 visitors (0 registered, 56 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:38 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Medical researches can be divided into two sorts:
those who think that meta is better and those
who believe that pooling is fooling.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5