A vs B [Design Issues]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2020-02-03 21:05 (439 d 16:14 ago) – Posting: # 21136
Views: 2,045

Hi John,

citing our Hero:

If one is really interested in λz and has no SD-phase in the study, sampling should continue until concentrations from previous doses are washed out – I would expect any estimate within the MD-profile to be biased towards faster elimination.

» I have seen both designs but I (and my former bosses) prefer method A. The only drawback I see from A is it takes longer time.

why does A take longer time?


Edit: Changed to internal link; see also this post #7[Helmut]

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,509 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 14:20 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5