Can of worms [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-01-30 15:12 (926 d 10:30 ago) – Posting: # 21105
Views: 3,918

Hi jag,

I agree with Helmut.
My top three for scientific advice is Sweden, Sweden, and Sweden.
You will of course not fall for the temptation to take sc. advice in the countries which are the most attractive business-wise.

It will likely be a 10(3). This is Europe, so if the study is conducted here you will be facing an IEC, not IRB, technically. And note that the IEC may be a bottle-neck. They can say no, even if the authority will say yes.

Try and discuss the case with different CROs, I think you find that several of them (in EU their numbers are limited) have been in situation before and have been discussing the matter with other sponsors + authorities as well as with IECs.
What are you actually going to measure? :-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,301 posts in 4,667 threads, 1,585 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 02:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

No written law has ever been more binding than
unwritten custom supported by popular opinion.    Carrie Chapman Catt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5