Can of worms [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2020-01-30 16:12 (1962 d 10:57 ago) – Posting: # 21105
Views: 5,932

Hi jag,

I agree with Helmut.
My top three for scientific advice is Sweden, Sweden, and Sweden.
You will of course not fall for the temptation to take sc. advice in the countries which are the most attractive business-wise.

It will likely be a 10(3). This is Europe, so if the study is conducted here you will be facing an IEC, not IRB, technically. And note that the IEC may be a bottle-neck. They can say no, even if the authority will say yes.

Try and discuss the case with different CROs, I think you find that several of them (in EU their numbers are limited) have been in situation before and have been discussing the matter with other sponsors + authorities as well as with IECs.
What are you actually going to measure? :-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To call the statistician after the experiment is done
may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination:
he may be able to say what the experiment died of.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5