no BE between early phase and Phase 3 formulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-01-22 17:15 (1101 d 05:03 ago) – Posting: # 21079
Views: 2,229

Hi Fabrice,

❝ Is FDA requiring a formal BE demonstration for bridging the early phase with the Phase 3 formulations?

❝ If so, what would be the required actions in case the Phase 3 formulation is not perfectly bioequivalent to the previously used formulation?


Without digging into guidelines: No. What we have in Phase I/II is sometimes not what I would call a ‘formulation’ in the biopharmaceutical sense at all. Anything goes: Manually filled capsules, lab-scale tablet-presses, etc. Doesn’t matter because we are interested in PK (I) and safety (II). Once you move to phase III you are bound to cGMP (though still in pilot-scale). Only when you move from III to the to be marketed formulation, the applicable SUPAC guidance (IR, MR, SS) cut in and very likely you need a BE study.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,477 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,603 registered users;
18 visitors (0 registered, 18 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 22:19 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5