no BE between early phase and Phase 3 formulations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-01-22 16:15 (364 d 13:47 ago) – Posting: # 21079
Views: 1,621

Hi Fabrice,

» Is FDA requiring a formal BE demonstration for bridging the early phase with the Phase 3 formulations?
» If so, what would be the required actions in case the Phase 3 formulation is not perfectly bioequivalent to the previously used formulation?

Without digging into guidelines: No. What we have in Phase I/II is sometimes not what I would call a ‘formulation’ in the biopharmaceutical sense at all. Anything goes: Manually filled capsules, lab-scale tablet-presses, etc. Doesn’t matter because we are interested in PK (I) and safety (II). Once you move to phase III you are bound to cGMP (though still in pilot-scale). Only when you move from III to the to be marketed formulation, the applicable SUPAC guidance (IR, MR, SS) cut in and very likely you need a BE study.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,308 posts in 4,444 threads, 1,489 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 06:02 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Politicians use statistics like drunkards use lampposts:
not for illumination, but for support.    attributed to Hans Kuhn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5