Participation databases [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2020-01-01 10:23 (908 d 18:37 ago) – Posting: # 21046
Views: 5,851

Hi ElMaestro,

» » Where should such a system be located? At the EMA?
»
» This would be an interesting discussion. A legal discussion, probably?

Given the European GDPR of 2016 for sure.

» » BTW, I like ANVISA’s system. The database is run by the agency and volunteers are blocked from participation in another study for six months.
»
» This is much like Ovis and its siblings.

THX for your summary. I was much too naïve. What a nightmare for inspectors!

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,178 posts in 4,646 threads, 1,571 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 06:00 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is futile to do with more things
that which can be done with fewer.    William of Ockham

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5