BE of racemic drugs (EMA’s practice) [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-30 14:35 2a02:8388:6bc2:ce80:ecf1:7da1:2052:4299 – Posting: # 21038
Views: 476

Hi Valiveti,

» Please update us the status of your query. same query was received from agency.

Are you aware that you are replying to an almost eight years old post? Looking at the profile of scorp2011 you would have discovered that he/she logged in for the last time 4½ years ago. An answer is unlikely.

Which agency? See this post (linked others within and followings). In none of the EMA’s product-specific guidances an enantiomeric separation is recommended. Are you a victim of the “backdoor”? More details, please.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,333 posts in 4,270 threads, 1,401 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 03:58 CET

No matter what side of the argument you are on,
you always find people on your side
that you wish were on the other.    Thomas Berger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5