2.220446e-16 ≈ 0 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-22 10:37 (432 d 14:20 ago) – Posting: # 21016
Views: 3,450

Hi ElMaestro,

» » For observation 8 we have -3.608225e-16, I think,
» I think, is around the "effective zero" for fits in R at default settings on 64- and 32-bit systems.

Yes, it is. ;-)

x    <- -3.608225e-16
zero <- .Machine$double.eps
all.equal(x, zero)
[1] TRUE
zero
[1] 2.220446e-16


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,357 posts in 4,459 threads, 1,492 registered users;
online 15 (0 registered, 15 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 00:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The way to do research is to attack the facts
at the point of greatest astonishment.    Celia Green

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5