2.220446e-16 ≈ 0 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-22 10:37 (882 d 21:40 ago) – Posting: # 21016
Views: 4,980

Hi ElMaestro,

» » For observation 8 we have -3.608225e-16, I think,
» I think, is around the "effective zero" for fits in R at default settings on 64- and 32-bit systems.

Yes, it is. ;-)

x    <- -3.608225e-16
zero <- .Machine$double.eps
all.equal(x, zero)
[1] TRUE
zero
[1] 2.220446e-16


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 54 (1 registered, 53 guests [including 46 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 09:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is no adequate defense, except stupidity,
against the impact of a new idea.    Percy Williams Bridgman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5