2.220446e-16 ≈ 0 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-22 10:37 (665 d 00:49 ago) – Posting: # 21016
Views: 4,385

Hi ElMaestro,

» » For observation 8 we have -3.608225e-16, I think,
» I think, is around the "effective zero" for fits in R at default settings on 64- and 32-bit systems.

Yes, it is. ;-)

x    <- -3.608225e-16
zero <- .Machine$double.eps
all.equal(x, zero)
[1] TRUE
zero
[1] 2.220446e-16


Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,731 posts in 4,544 threads, 1,543 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 12:26 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Be very, very careful what you put into that head,
because you will never, ever get it out.    Thomas Wolsey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5