2.220446e-16 ≈ 0 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-22 10:37  – Posting: # 21016
Views: 1,779

Hi ElMaestro,

» » For observation 8 we have -3.608225e-16, I think,
» I think, is around the "effective zero" for fits in R at default settings on 64- and 32-bit systems.

Yes, it is. ;-)

x    <- -3.608225e-16
zero <- .Machine$double.eps
all.equal(x, zero)
[1] TRUE
zero
[1] 2.220446e-16


Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,635 posts in 4,324 threads, 1,434 registered users;
online 19 (1 registered, 18 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.    Aldous Huxley

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5