Revalidation? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-18 16:40 2a02:8388:6bc2:ce80:6c4e:e4df:42f4:6510 – Posting: # 21000
Views: 661

Hi Mittyri,

» […] approach when the method is revalidated taking into account Cmax values of that subjects (LLOQ should be less than 5% min Cmax of those) and then the affected volunteers are reanalyzed (of course till the moment of database lock). What do you think?

Yes, why not? As long as the data are not unblinded, it should not hurt. However,

» Recently we submitted a BE study to EU…

(my emphasis)

Hence, it can be just another kind of sensitivity analysis.


Posting # 21,000. :-D

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,345 posts in 4,273 threads, 1,402 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 03:21 UTC

The internet gave us all the power of speech,
and what did we discover?
That victory goes to he who shouts the loudest,
and that reason does not sell.    Claire North

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5