Revalidation? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-18 17:40 (886 d 15:14 ago) – Posting: # 21000
Views: 2,641

Hi Mittyri,

» […] approach when the method is revalidated taking into account Cmax values of that subjects (LLOQ should be less than 5% min Cmax of those) and then the affected volunteers are reanalyzed (of course till the moment of database lock). What do you think?

Yes, why not? As long as the data are not unblinded, it should not hurt. However,

» Recently we submitted a BE study to EU…

(my emphasis)

Hence, it can be just another kind of sensitivity analysis.

Posting # 21,000. :-D

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,091 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,566 registered users;
online 41 (1 registered, 40 guests [including 24 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 09:54 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is no adequate defense, except stupidity,
against the impact of a new idea.    Percy Williams Bridgman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz