Revalidation? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-18 17:40 (486 d 18:38 ago) – Posting: # 21000
Views: 2,074

Hi Mittyri,

» […] approach when the method is revalidated taking into account Cmax values of that subjects (LLOQ should be less than 5% min Cmax of those) and then the affected volunteers are reanalyzed (of course till the moment of database lock). What do you think?

Yes, why not? As long as the data are not unblinded, it should not hurt. However,

» Recently we submitted a BE study to EU…

(my emphasis)

Hence, it can be just another kind of sensitivity analysis.


Posting # 21,000. :-D

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,509 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 13:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5