Revalidation? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-12-18 17:52 (1191 d 01:55 ago) – Posting: # 20997
Views: 2,786

Hi Helmut and Dan,

❝ ❝ […] no detected concentrations in the predose samples for these subjects.

❝ Yep but the method was not sensitive enough for these subjects. Hence, I support Dan’s suggestion (exclude the subjects and check whether you still pass BE).


I heard about approach when the method is revalidated taking into account Cmax values of that subjects (LLOQ should be less than 5% min Cmax of those) and then the affected volunteers are reanalyzed (of course till the moment of database lock). What do you think?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,548 posts in 4,723 threads, 1,606 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:48 CET (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t really say “similar” if it’s the same again you want.
“Similar” means something different.    Anthony Burgess

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5