Revalidation? [Study As­sess­ment]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-12-18 17:52 (1788 d 10:41 ago) – Posting: # 20997
Views: 4,410

Hi Helmut and Dan,

❝ ❝ […] no detected concentrations in the predose samples for these subjects.

❝ Yep but the method was not sensitive enough for these subjects. Hence, I support Dan’s suggestion (exclude the subjects and check whether you still pass BE).


I heard about approach when the method is revalidated taking into account Cmax values of that subjects (LLOQ should be less than 5% min Cmax of those) and then the affected volunteers are reanalyzed (of course till the moment of database lock). What do you think?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,291 posts in 4,891 threads, 1,661 registered users;
92 visitors (0 registered, 92 guests [including 15 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:33 CET (Europe/Vienna)

I never did anything worth doing by accident,
nor did any of my inventions come by accident;
they came by work.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5