1×2 ≠ 2×1 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-14 00:42  – Posting: # 20974
Views: 811

Hi John,

» The design is obviously wrong (due to IR dosing regimen) …

Yep.

» … but would a regulatory body reject the study (assume the study pass the BE objective which is BE needed only for auc).

I hope so. Imagine you have capacity-limited elimination. You would partly saturate the enzymes with the 1×2 regimen and see a higher AUC than with 2×1. Hence, the T/R-ratio will be positively biased. In an extreme case the study passes with the wrong design but would have failed with the correct one.

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,336 posts in 4,270 threads, 1,401 registered users;
online 19 (1 registered, 18 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 11:33 CET

Medical statistician: One who will not accept that Columbus discovered America…
because he said he was looking for India in the trial plan.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5