1×2 ≠ 2×1 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-14 01:42 (1086 d 03:41 ago) – Posting: # 20974
Views: 2,914

Hi John,

❝ The design is obviously wrong (due to IR dosing regimen) …


Yep.

❝ … but would a regulatory body reject the study (assume the study pass the BE objective which is BE needed only for auc).


I hope so. Imagine you have capacity-limited elimination. You would partly saturate the enzymes with the 1×2 regimen and see a higher AUC than with 2×1. Hence, the T/R-ratio will be positively biased. In an extreme case the study passes with the wrong design but would have failed with the correct one.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,427 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,598 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:24 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Operational hectic replaces
intellectual calms.    Alexander Huiskes

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5