1×2 ≠ 2×1 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-14 00:42 (440 d 03:50 ago) – Posting: # 20974
Views: 2,140

Hi John,

» The design is obviously wrong (due to IR dosing regimen) …

Yep.

» … but would a regulatory body reject the study (assume the study pass the BE objective which is BE needed only for auc).

I hope so. Imagine you have capacity-limited elimination. You would partly saturate the enzymes with the 1×2 regimen and see a higher AUC than with 2×1. Hence, the T/R-ratio will be positively biased. In an extreme case the study passes with the wrong design but would have failed with the correct one.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,356 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 14 (0 registered, 14 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 04:33 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Those who make no mistakes are making the biggest mistakes of all 
they are attempting nothing new.    Anthony de Mello

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5