1×2 ≠ 2×1 [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-14 01:42 (1581 d 11:47 ago) – Posting: # 20974
Views: 3,390

Hi John,

❝ The design is obviously wrong (due to IR dosing regimen) …


Yep.

❝ … but would a regulatory body reject the study (assume the study pass the BE objective which is BE needed only for auc).


I hope so. Imagine you have capacity-limited elimination. You would partly saturate the enzymes with the 1×2 regimen and see a higher AUC than with 2×1. Hence, the T/R-ratio will be positively biased. In an extreme case the study passes with the wrong design but would have failed with the correct one.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,980 posts in 4,821 threads, 1,659 registered users;
30 visitors (0 registered, 30 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 14:30 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never, never, never use any software!
Never, never, never trust any computer!    Detlew Labes

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5