No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by PharmCat  – Russia, 2019-12-06 23:46 (985 d 21:41 ago) – Posting: # 20954
Views: 5,336

Hi all!

» Correct. If we would be allowed (pun!) to use a mixed-effects model. Patterson and Jones argued against this doubtful practice and the ethical implications of discarding data.

Really, there is no problem in mixed model approach to use all data if model constructed correctly. May be not all regulatory bodies can understand how it works - it is not rare situations when I get issue like "Give me ANOVA!!! I don't want to see your GLM or MIXED...", pfff... or "In guideline ***(any ancient as mammoth's excrement guideline) written ratio of geometric means - please just divide one to another and give me CI"... So here two answers - theoretically there is no problem to use all data, but regulatory authorities can bann you for it. (IMHO)

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 22:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

On two occasions I have been asked,—“Pray, Mr. Babbage,
if you put into the machine wrong figures,…
will the right answers come out?”
 …
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question.    Charles Babbage

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5