Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Cmax ER = Cmax IR ?

Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by jag009 – NJ, 2019-12-06 22:21 (1592 d 08:24 ago) – Posting: # 20950
Views: 2,697

Hi Helmut (and guys and girls)

❝ Had that on this side of the pond as well (called a “hybrid application”); multiphasic product. C_max was doable but only with expanded limits.

Do you know of any articles which say that Cmax is not a primary parameter (for equivalence) for ER product, when compared to IR?

Thx
john

Complete thread:

NDA study for Mexico jag009 2019-12-06 16:19 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Helmut 2019-12-06 16:41
  - Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option mittyri 2019-12-06 17:08
    - Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option Helmut 2019-12-06 17:36
  - Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? jag009 2019-12-06 17:38
    - Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Helmut 2019-12-06 17:45
      - Cmax ER = Cmax IR ?jag009 2019-12-06 21:21
        
        Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Yura 2019-12-06 22:40
        
        Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? jag009 2019-12-09 18:15

Admin contact
22,984 posts in 4,822 threads, 1,650 registered users;
57 visitors (0 registered, 57 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 07:45 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

You can’t fix by analysis
what you bungled by design. Richard J. Light, Judith D. Singer, John B. Willett

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC

Ing. Helmut Schütz