Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 17:45 (521 d 14:11 ago) – Posting: # 20949
Views: 2,027

Hi John,

» » If you would succeed in demonstrating BE of Cmax you would have proven that your product is not an ER. Bizarre idea.
»
» Exactly. I am at a lost. I am not sure if the reviewer misread the protocol …

Might well be.

» … or he doesn't understand the concept.

Well,…

» Having said that (dont laugh), FDA once asked us to show BE for a 505b2 for an once day ER vs IR @ 4 hrs with respect to Cmax and AUC. It was v strange unless they are suspecting that Cmax is associated with efficacy (somehow).

Had that on this side of the pond as well (called a “hybrid application”); multiphasic product. Cmax was doable but only with expanded limits.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,446 posts in 4,483 threads, 1,511 registered users;
online 11 (0 registered, 11 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 08:56 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The fact that some geniuses were laughed at
does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5