Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 17:45 (651 d 05:24 ago) – Posting: # 20949
Views: 2,144

Hi John,

» » If you would succeed in demonstrating BE of Cmax you would have proven that your product is not an ER. Bizarre idea.
»
» Exactly. I am at a lost. I am not sure if the reviewer misread the protocol …

Might well be.

» … or he doesn't understand the concept.

Well,…

» Having said that (dont laugh), FDA once asked us to show BE for a 505b2 for an once day ER vs IR @ 4 hrs with respect to Cmax and AUC. It was v strange unless they are suspecting that Cmax is associated with efficacy (somehow).

Had that on this side of the pond as well (called a “hybrid application”); multiphasic product. Cmax was doable but only with expanded limits.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,689 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 00:09 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Old beliefs die hard
even when demonstrably false.    E. O. Wilson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5