Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option [Regulatives / Guidelines]
Hi All,
Hmmm
the only option I see is something like this
Could it be Mexico's reviewers ER vision?
❝ What‽ If you would succeed in demonstrating BE of Cmax you would have proven that your product is not an ER. Bizarre idea.
Hmmm
the only option I see is something like this
t <- c(seq(0,24,0.1))
ka <- .5
ke <- 0.1
D = 100
V = 2
C <- D/V*(ka/(ka-ke))*(exp(-ke*t) - exp(-ka*t))
C[50] <- C[50]*10
ggplot2::qplot(t,C, geom = "line")
Could it be Mexico's reviewers ER vision?
—
Kind regards,
Mittyri
Kind regards,
Mittyri
Complete thread:
- NDA study for Mexico jag009 2019-12-06 16:19 [Regulatives / Guidelines]
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Helmut 2019-12-06 16:41
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only optionmittyri 2019-12-06 17:08
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option Helmut 2019-12-06 17:36
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? jag009 2019-12-06 17:38
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Helmut 2019-12-06 17:45
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? jag009 2019-12-06 21:21
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Yura 2019-12-06 22:40
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? jag009 2019-12-09 18:15
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Yura 2019-12-06 22:40
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? jag009 2019-12-06 21:21
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Helmut 2019-12-06 17:45
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only optionmittyri 2019-12-06 17:08
- Cmax ER = Cmax IR ? Helmut 2019-12-06 16:41