Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-12-06 18:08 (1158 d 22:01 ago) – Posting: # 20946
Views: 2,354

Hi All,

What‽ If you would succeed in demonstrating BE of Cmax you would have proven that your product is not an ER. Bizarre idea.

the only option I see is something like this
t <- c(seq(0,24,0.1))
ka <- .5
ke <- 0.1
D = 100
V = 2
C <- D/V*(ka/(ka-ke))*(exp(-ke*t) - exp(-ka*t))
C[50] <- C[50]*10
ggplot2::qplot(t,C, geom = "line")

Could it be Mexico's reviewers ER vision?

Kind regards,

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,485 posts in 4,710 threads, 1,603 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:10 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz