Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-12-06 18:08 (1627 d 17:34 ago) – Posting: # 20946
Views: 2,884

Hi All,

What‽ If you would succeed in demonstrating BE of Cmax you would have proven that your product is not an ER. Bizarre idea.


Hmmm
the only option I see is something like this
t <- c(seq(0,24,0.1))
ka <- .5
ke <- 0.1
D = 100
V = 2
C <- D/V*(ka/(ka-ke))*(exp(-ke*t) - exp(-ka*t))
C[50] <- C[50]*10
ggplot2::qplot(t,C, geom = "line")

[image]
Could it be Mexico's reviewers ER vision?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,034 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,647 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 12:43 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Give me a fruitful error any time, full of seeds, bursting with its own corrections.
You can keep your sterile truth for yourself.    Vilfredo Pareto

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5