Cmax ER = Cmax IR - the only option [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by mittyri – Russia, 2019-12-06 18:08 (1158 d 22:01 ago) – Posting: # 20946
Views: 2,354

Hi All,

What‽ If you would succeed in demonstrating BE of Cmax you would have proven that your product is not an ER. Bizarre idea.


Hmmm
the only option I see is something like this
t <- c(seq(0,24,0.1))
ka <- .5
ke <- 0.1
D = 100
V = 2
C <- D/V*(ka/(ka-ke))*(exp(-ke*t) - exp(-ka*t))
C[50] <- C[50]*10
ggplot2::qplot(t,C, geom = "line")

[image]
Could it be Mexico's reviewers ER vision?

Kind regards,
Mittyri

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,485 posts in 4,710 threads, 1,603 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: 16:10 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5