No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 15:47 (1746 d 10:17 ago) – Posting: # 20942
Views: 6,807

Ahoy my capt’n and welcome back to this side of the pond!

❝ I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers …


Those days when studies were evaluated by a paired t-test with a pocket calculator?

❝ – I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.


Correct. If we would be allowed (pun!) to use a mixed-effects model. Patterson and Jones argued against this doubtful practice and the ethical implications of discarding data.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,225 posts in 4,879 threads, 1,654 registered users;
37 visitors (0 registered, 37 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real purpose of the scientific method is to make sure
nature hasn’t misled you into thinking you know something
you actually don’t know.    Robert M. Pirsig

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5