No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 15:47 (2017 d 12:47 ago) – Posting: # 20942
Views: 9,611

Ahoy my capt’n and welcome back to this side of the pond!

❝ I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers …


Those days when studies were evaluated by a paired t-test with a pocket calculator?

❝ – I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.


Correct. If we would be allowed (pun!) to use a mixed-effects model. Patterson and Jones argued against this doubtful practice and the ethical implications of discarding data.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,424 posts in 4,927 threads, 1,672 registered users;
14 visitors (0 registered, 14 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:34 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

To call the statistician after the experiment is done
may be no more than asking him to perform a postmortem examination:
he may be able to say what the experiment died of.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5