No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 14:47 (294 d 03:43 ago) – Posting: # 20942
Views: 3,412

Ahoy my capt’n and welcome back to this side of the pond!

» I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers …

Those days when studies were evaluated by a paired t-test with a pocket calculator?

» – I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.

Correct. If we would be allowed (pun!) to use a mixed-effects model. Patterson and Jones argued against this doubtful practice and the ethical implications of discarding data.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,075 posts in 4,394 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 7 (1 registered, 6 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 19:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

If you think it’s simple,
then you have misunderstood the problem.    Bjarne Stroustrup

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5