No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-12-06 14:47 (934 d 13:56 ago) – Posting: # 20942
Views: 5,333

Ahoy my capt’n and welcome back to this side of the pond!

» I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers …

Those days when studies were evaluated by a paired t-test with a pocket calculator?

» – I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.

Correct. If we would be allowed (pun!) to use a mixed-effects model. Patterson and Jones argued against this doubtful practice and the ethical implications of discarding data.*



Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖 [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,178 posts in 4,646 threads, 1,571 registered users;
online 18 (0 registered, 18 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 05:44 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is futile to do with more things
that which can be done with fewer.    William of Ockham

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5