No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-12-06 14:14 (1147 d 15:41 ago) – Posting: # 20941
Views: 5,418

Hello, both,

❝ ❝ At this situation, should this subject's data with one period be included in the BE assessment?


❝ No, you could not.


We do not need a T-R comparison in each subject to do an analysis. We are just stuck in that paradigm. We could in principle fit a model with missing period data. And all data could be used for the calculation of the CI.
I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers - I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,477 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,603 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:55 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5