No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-12-06 13:14 (984 d 01:22 ago) – Posting: # 20941
Views: 5,324

Hello, both,

» » At this situation, should this subject's data with one period be included in the BE assessment?
»
» No, you could not.

We do not need a T-R comparison in each subject to do an analysis. We are just stuck in that paradigm. We could in principle fit a model with missing period data. And all data could be used for the calculation of the CI.
I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers - I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,302 posts in 4,667 threads, 1,586 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 15:36 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In matters of style, swim with the current;
in matters of principle, stand like a rock.    Thomas Jefferson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5