No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-12-06 14:14 (1092 d 09:45 ago) – Posting: # 20941
Views: 5,386

Hello, both,

❝ ❝ At this situation, should this subject's data with one period be included in the BE assessment?


❝ No, you could not.


We do not need a T-R comparison in each subject to do an analysis. We are just stuck in that paradigm. We could in principle fit a model with missing period data. And all data could be used for the calculation of the CI.
I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers - I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,425 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,600 registered users;
15 visitors (2 registered, 13 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:59 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The rise of biometry in this 20th century,
like that of geometry in the 3rd century before Christ,
seems to mark out one of the great ages or critical periods
in the advance of the human understanding.    R.A. Fisher

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5