No way! But... [Design Issues]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-12-06 14:14 (1601 d 12:15 ago) – Posting: # 20941
Views: 6,063

Hello, both,

❝ ❝ At this situation, should this subject's data with one period be included in the BE assessment?


❝ No, you could not.


We do not need a T-R comparison in each subject to do an analysis. We are just stuck in that paradigm. We could in principle fit a model with missing period data. And all data could be used for the calculation of the CI.
I do not know why there is a regulatory tradition for only using completers - I would say there is even a potential scientific and ethical advantage of using all period data.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,993 posts in 4,828 threads, 1,656 registered users;
121 visitors (0 registered, 121 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:29 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Never never never never use Excel.
Not even for calculation of arithmetic means.    Martin Wolfsegger

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5