Active metabolites: to measure or not to measure [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-12-05 23:22 (933 d 16:54 ago) – Posting: # 20934
Views: 1,253

Hello Elena777,

my recent experience in EU is that they tend to ask for the parent, and only the parent, if this can be measured (and if systemically acting blah blah).
I did not see a dossier recently where they asked additionally into the metabolite.
So, as regards parent versus metabolite they seem in my experience to follow guidelines to the word, but with one exception: You can have a great meeting with 16 questions, all being answered in no time, and you are ready to leave the agency with final handshakes and big smiles, when someone whispers: "Hey, what about back-conversion?" Then all bets are off, especially if you are not 120% sure you have firm control over it. You can be asked to measure everything and do all what that it implies in terms of acquisition of weird reference standards and setting up assays. :crying:

There is also some regulatory wobble regarding enantiomers. Sometimes they ask for a chiral assay, and sometimes they don't and their choice seems not to always follow the formal criteria criteria stated in the guideline. I haven't cracked the code yet, but Hötzi has a good story about it from the horse's mouth. :-D

Hötzi, over to you...

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,171 posts in 4,646 threads, 1,570 registered users;
online 14 (1 registered, 13 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 17:16 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The person interested in success has to learn
to view failure as a healthy, inevitable part
of the process of getting to the top.    Joyce Brothers

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz