Fieller’s (‘fiducial’) confidence interval [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-29 16:53 (1093 d 16:04 ago) – Posting: # 20897
Views: 2,491

Hi Hötzi,

❝ Nope.


For such cases we are setting logscale to False, right?
PowerTOST says about theta1: "Defaults to 0.8 if logscale=TRUE or to -0.2 if logscale=FALSE. "
So as I read it, when logscale=F theta1 defaults to -.2 or we set it to something negative. This is how I think Hauchke's f1 and theta1 get confused.

I will read up on the other stuff. Still not sure how to derive the CI. it is a really interesting problem, though. Feels like going back into a discussion which was closed decades ago before I knew anything about BE :-)

Thanks PharmCat for the ref. below.:-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,417 posts in 4,692 threads, 1,596 registered users;
17 visitors (0 registered, 17 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

To know that we know what we know,
and to know that we do not know what we do not know,
that is true knowledge.    Nicolaus Copernicus

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5