Fieller’s (‘fiducial’) confidence interval [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2019-11-29 15:53  – Posting: # 20897
Views: 198

Hi Hötzi,

» Nope.

For such cases we are setting logscale to False, right?
PowerTOST says about theta1: "Defaults to 0.8 if logscale=TRUE or to -0.2 if logscale=FALSE. "
So as I read it, when logscale=F theta1 defaults to -.2 or we set it to something negative. This is how I think Hauchke's f1 and theta1 get confused.

I will read up on the other stuff. Still not sure how to derive the CI. it is a really interesting problem, though. Feels like going back into a discussion which was closed decades ago before I knew anything about BE :-)

Thanks PharmCat for the ref. below.:-)

I could be wrong, but...
Best regards,
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,129 posts in 4,245 threads, 1,384 registered users;
online 13 (2 registered, 11 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 11:57 CET

Be very, very careful what you put into that head,
because you will never, ever get it out.    Thomas Wolsey

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5