Fieller’s (‘fiducial’) confidence interval [General Sta­tis­tics]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-29 15:53 (530 d 11:31 ago) – Posting: # 20897
Views: 2,039

Hi Hötzi,

» Nope.

For such cases we are setting logscale to False, right?
PowerTOST says about theta1: "Defaults to 0.8 if logscale=TRUE or to -0.2 if logscale=FALSE. "
So as I read it, when logscale=F theta1 defaults to -.2 or we set it to something negative. This is how I think Hauchke's f1 and theta1 get confused.

I will read up on the other stuff. Still not sure how to derive the CI. it is a really interesting problem, though. Feels like going back into a discussion which was closed decades ago before I knew anything about BE :-)

Thanks PharmCat for the ref. below.:-)

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,457 posts in 4,485 threads, 1,512 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 04:25 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing in the world is more dangerous
than sincere ignorance
and conscientious stupidity.    Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5