the run passes = there is no problem? [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-13 18:35 (1181 d 21:06 ago) – Posting: # 20799
Views: 3,521

Hi nobody,

❝ I like discussions along the line "problem -> solution". So: if the LLOQ is rock solid, the calibration function stable and the QCs don't indicate a problem, why should I take care of day-to-day variations in IS response too much?


Using the same kind of argumentation why would you worry about IS at all then? If the run passes why would IS responses in any way be a worry under any circumstance?
If the purpose of a car is to take you from A to B why would anyone care if it starts making sudden clonking noises?

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,485 posts in 4,710 threads, 1,603 registered users;
25 visitors (0 registered, 25 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 15:42 CET (Europe/Vienna)

The difference between a surrogate and a true endpoint
is like the difference between a cheque and cash.
You can get the cheque earlier but then,
of course, it might bounce.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5