Not more on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2019-11-13 11:06 (1587 d 21:25 ago) – Posting: # 20797
Views: 3,927

Not a key opinion leader in this field, but:

I like discussions along the line "problem -> solution". So: if the LLOQ is rock solid, the calibration function stable and the QCs don't indicate a problem, why should I take care of day-to-day variations in IS response too much?

If have had cases where different lab people (in the good old days of liquid-liquid extraction, though...) could produce different IS response with absolute same equipment, solutions, protocols to follow. Why bother to much, as long the quality of the method/validation covers that?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,940 posts in 4,812 threads, 1,640 registered users;
38 visitors (0 registered, 38 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 08:31 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Those people who think they know everything
are a great annoyance to those of us who do.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5