Not more on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2019-11-13 11:06 (1617 d 06:10 ago) – Posting: # 20797
Views: 4,024

Not a key opinion leader in this field, but:

I like discussions along the line "problem -> solution". So: if the LLOQ is rock solid, the calibration function stable and the QCs don't indicate a problem, why should I take care of day-to-day variations in IS response too much?

If have had cases where different lab people (in the good old days of liquid-liquid extraction, though...) could produce different IS response with absolute same equipment, solutions, protocols to follow. Why bother to much, as long the quality of the method/validation covers that?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,985 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,654 registered users;
43 visitors (0 registered, 43 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 18:17 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Complex, statistically improbable things are by their nature
more difficult to explain than
simple, statistically probable things.    Richard Dawkins

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5