Not more on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by nobody – 2019-11-13 10:06 (269 d 02:55 ago) – Posting: # 20797
Views: 2,400

Not a key opinion leader in this field, but:

I like discussions along the line "problem -> solution". So: if the LLOQ is rock solid, the calibration function stable and the QCs don't indicate a problem, why should I take care of day-to-day variations in IS response too much?

If have had cases where different lab people (in the good old days of liquid-liquid extraction, though...) could produce different IS response with absolute same equipment, solutions, protocols to follow. Why bother to much, as long the quality of the method/validation covers that?

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,982 posts in 4,374 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 18 (0 registered, 18 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 14:01 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Patients may recover in spite of drugs or because of them.    John Gaddum

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5