More on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-12 14:38 (1588 d 21:19 ago) – Posting: # 20790
Views: 4,059

Hi Hötzi,

❝ I don’t see how that can affect the IS (and analyte) response unless someone works with peak heights (who does it nowadays?)…


As a general rule the S:N become more unfavourable as the column ages and peak separation suffers. This affects the identifcation of peaks and their integration. It will be more pronounced for the analyte near the LLOQ than for the IS.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,940 posts in 4,812 threads, 1,639 registered users;
54 visitors (1 registered, 53 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:57 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Those people who think they know everything
are a great annoyance to those of us who do.    Isaac Asimov

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5