More on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-12 13:38 (923 d 05:13 ago) – Posting: # 20790
Views: 3,496

Hi Hötzi,

» I don’t see how that can affect the IS (and analyte) response unless someone works with peak heights (who does it nowadays?)…

As a general rule the S:N become more unfavourable as the column ages and peak separation suffers. This affects the identifcation of peaks and their integration. It will be more pronounced for the analyte near the LLOQ than for the IS.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,092 posts in 4,630 threads, 1,567 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 19:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

There is no adequate defense, except stupidity,
against the impact of a new idea.    Percy Williams Bridgman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5