More on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-12 14:38 (1119 d 07:15 ago) – Posting: # 20790
Views: 3,643

Hi Hötzi,

❝ I don’t see how that can affect the IS (and analyte) response unless someone works with peak heights (who does it nowadays?)…


As a general rule the S:N become more unfavourable as the column ages and peak separation suffers. This affects the identifcation of peaks and their integration. It will be more pronounced for the analyte near the LLOQ than for the IS.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,428 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,598 registered users;
20 visitors (0 registered, 20 guests [including 16 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:54 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Statistics is the art of never having to say you’re wrong.
Variance is what any two statisticians are at.    C.J. Bradfield

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5