More on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-12 13:38 (523 d 07:49 ago) – Posting: # 20790
Views: 3,127

Hi Hötzi,

» I don’t see how that can affect the IS (and analyte) response unless someone works with peak heights (who does it nowadays?)…

As a general rule the S:N become more unfavourable as the column ages and peak separation suffers. This affects the identifcation of peaks and their integration. It will be more pronounced for the analyte near the LLOQ than for the IS.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,508 registered users;
online 6 (0 registered, 6 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 22:28 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5