More on IS response variations [Regulatives / Guidelines]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-11-12 14:38 (1477 d 18:46 ago) – Posting: # 20790
Views: 3,878

Hi Hötzi,

❝ I don’t see how that can affect the IS (and analyte) response unless someone works with peak heights (who does it nowadays?)…


As a general rule the S:N become more unfavourable as the column ages and peak separation suffers. This affects the identifcation of peaks and their integration. It will be more pronounced for the analyte near the LLOQ than for the IS.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,811 posts in 4,783 threads, 1,642 registered users;
12 visitors (0 registered, 12 guests [including 7 identified bots]).
Forum time: 09:25 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Every man gets a narrower and narrower field of knowledge
in which he must be an expert in order to compete with other people.
The specialist knows more and more about less and less
and finally knows everything about nothing.    Konrad Lorenz

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5