Kenward-Roger ≥ Satterthwaite [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-11-08 20:57 (474 d 00:37 ago) – Posting: # 20771
Views: 5,354

Hi PharmCat,

» I thought that Kenward-Roger provide the same DF as Satterthwaite's for one-dimension effects, so as CI for coefficient is one-dimension hypothesis DF should be the same, as it describes in reference paper, may be SAS make any corrections, I don't know...

Try this one:

library(replicateBE)
ds  <- substr(grep("rds", unname(unlist(data(package = "replicateBE"))),
                   value = TRUE), start = 1, stop = 5)
res <- data.frame(rds = 1:length(ds), df.Satt = NA, df.KR = NA)
for (j in seq_along(ds)) {
  res$df.Satt[j] <- method.B(option = 1, print = FALSE, details = TRUE,
                             data = eval(parse(text = ds[j])))$DF
  res$df.KR[j]   <- method.B(option = 3, print = FALSE, details = TRUE,
                             data = eval(parse(text = ds[j])))$DF
}
res[, 2:3] <- signif(res[, 2:3], 5)
print(res, row.names = FALSE)


The EMA’s Method B evaluated by lmer() of package lmerTest. Kenward-Roger’s degrees of freedom ≥ Satterthwaite’s.

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,355 posts in 4,458 threads, 1,493 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 21:34 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It is better to be wrong than to be vague.
In trial and error, the error is the true essential.    Freeman Dyson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5