Kenward-Roger? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by PharmCat  – Russia, 2019-11-06 15:43 (1857 d 21:46 ago) – Posting: # 20755
Views: 11,615

❝ From a theoretical perspective, maybe. The Kenward-Roger approximation recovers more information from the data, higher degrees of freedom and hence, results in a narrower confidence interval than with Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom. Since the latter is explicitely recommended in the progesterone guidance I have some doubts whether the FDA would accept that.


I thought that Kenward-Roger provide the same DF as Satterthwaite's for one-dimension effects, so as CI for coefficient is one-dimension hypothesis DF should be the same, as it describes in reference paper, may be SAS make any corrections, I don't know... Is any comparations anywhere?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,335 posts in 4,901 threads, 1,670 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:29 CET (Europe/Vienna)

There are many questions which fools can ask
that wise men cannot answer.    George Pólya

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5