Kenward-Roger? [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by PharmCat  – Russia, 2019-11-06 14:43 (1016 d 07:19 ago) – Posting: # 20755
Views: 7,597

» From a theoretical perspective, maybe. The Kenward-Roger approximation recovers more information from the data, higher degrees of freedom and hence, results in a narrower confidence interval than with Satterthwaite’s degrees of freedom. Since the latter is explicitely recommended in the progesterone guidance I have some doubts whether the FDA would accept that.

I thought that Kenward-Roger provide the same DF as Satterthwaite's for one-dimension effects, so as CI for coefficient is one-dimension hypothesis DF should be the same, as it describes in reference paper, may be SAS make any corrections, I don't know... Is any comparations anywhere?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,305 posts in 4,668 threads, 1,587 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Thursday 23:02 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

On two occasions I have been asked,—“Pray, Mr. Babbage,
if you put into the machine wrong figures,…
will the right answers come out?”
 …
I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas
that could provoke such a question.    Charles Babbage

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5