Emesis criteria for study comparing IR vs. MR formulations [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by nobody – 2019-10-16 17:22 (1144 d 14:35 ago) – Posting: # 20694
Views: 3,363

❝ MR: Since you likely are facing flip-flop PK (where the late part of the profile represents absorption).


...which is "very conservative", to say the least (and stay politicialy correct....)


btw. since when do you load scripts from cloudf**k for the forum? Don't like...

Kindest regards, nobody

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,427 posts in 4,694 threads, 1,598 registered users;
16 visitors (0 registered, 16 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Operational hectic replaces
intellectual calms.    Alexander Huiskes

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5