Emesis criteria for study comparing IR vs. MR formulations [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-16 15:53 (1198 d 15:42 ago) – Posting: # 20692
Views: 3,409

Hi Rock,

❝ In a study comparing Test (Immediate Release) vs. Reference (Modified Release) formulations, on which formulations the withdrawal criteria on emesis should be based …


For the IR formulation most people opt at two times the median tmax.
For the MR formulation the entire intended dosing interval.

❝ … and why?


IR: That’s the inflection point of the profile where absorption is essentially (98.44%) complete.
MR: Since you likely are facing flip-flop PK (where the late part of the profile represents absorption). Hence, for o.a.d. 24 hours, for b.i.d. 12 hours (even if you administered it only once).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,477 posts in 4,708 threads, 1,603 registered users;
24 visitors (0 registered, 24 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 06:35 CET (Europe/Vienna)

In these matters the only certainty is
that nothing is certain.    Pliny the Elder

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5