Emesis criteria for study comparing IR vs. MR formulations [Study Per­for­mance]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-16 15:53 (1685 d 05:28 ago) – Posting: # 20692
Views: 4,173

Hi Rock,

❝ In a study comparing Test (Immediate Release) vs. Reference (Modified Release) formulations, on which formulations the withdrawal criteria on emesis should be based …


For the IR formulation most people opt at two times the median tmax.
For the MR formulation the entire intended dosing interval.

❝ … and why?


IR: That’s the inflection point of the profile where absorption is essentially (98.44%) complete.
MR: Since you likely are facing flip-flop PK (where the late part of the profile represents absorption). Hence, for o.a.d. 24 hours, for b.i.d. 12 hours (even if you administered it only once).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,035 posts in 4,835 threads, 1,645 registered users;
63 visitors (0 registered, 63 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 21:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

That which is static and repetitive is boring.
That which is dynamic and random is confusing.
In between lies art.    John Locke

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5