Missing periods in replicate designs [RSABE / ABEL]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-16 11:14 (461 d 13:35 ago) – Posting: # 20690
Views: 7,271

Dear all,

sometimes I see reports with a strange pattern of missing periods, e.g., subjects without the 1st period, subjects with only the 1st and the 4th, etc. Since I have only the statistical part of the report, I have no clue what was going on.
For the FDA’s RSABE only subjects with complete data (all periods) are used. But this is not the case for the EMA’s ABEL (all subjects with at least one T and R treatment for the calculation of the CI, all subjects with two R treatments for the calculation of CVwR).

I would say:Did you see cases like this? And if yes, do you know why?
I saw even cases where a subject in sequence TRTR had data only of periods 1 & 3. Useless.
Another case: 44 subjects had two administrations of T and R. However, 15 had two administrations of T and 39 two administrations of R. Chance – or what?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,306 posts in 4,443 threads, 1,488 registered users;
online 3 (0 registered, 3 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 00:49 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

Power: That which is wielded by the priesthood of
clinical trials, the statisticians, and a stick which they use
to beta their colleagues.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz