Ahem – number of units? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-06 20:14 (1686 d 17:16 ago) – Posting: # 20670
Views: 5,647

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ ❝ […] Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria are met?


❝ I think yours is the right interpretation.


Was also the opinion of some experts at BioBridges. Left the audience speechless.

❝ And it is free of cost, right? [etc. etc.]



Sure. The problem is the ‘regulatory crep’ I suspected in my post. Jiři showed nice simulations about the false positive rate. To squeeze the lower CL ≥50 is not another league but another sport. How many units will we have to test in the future? 24, 48, 96?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,029 posts in 4,834 threads, 1,644 registered users;
28 visitors (0 registered, 28 guests [including 3 identified bots]).
Forum time: 13:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

We must be careful not to confuse data with the abstractions
we use to analyze them.    William James

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5