Ahem – number of units? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-06 20:14 (1265 d 22:43 ago) – Posting: # 20670
Views: 4,534

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ ❝ […] Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria are met?

❝ I think yours is the right interpretation.

Was also the opinion of some experts at BioBridges. Left the audience speechless.

❝ And it is free of cost, right? [etc. etc.]

Sure. The problem is the ‘regulatory crep’ I suspected in my post. Jiři showed nice simulations about the false positive rate. To squeeze the lower CL ≥50 is not another league but another sport. How many units will we have to test in the future? 24, 48, 96?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,550 posts in 4,724 threads, 1,606 registered users;
18 visitors (1 registered, 17 guests [including 9 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:58 CET (Europe/Vienna)

If there is an exception to any rule,
and if it can be proved by observation,
that rule is wrong.    Richard Feynman

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz