Ahem – number of units? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-06 18:14  – Posting: # 20670
Views: 819

Hi ElMaestro,

» » […] Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria are met?
»
» I think yours is the right interpretation.

Was also the opinion of some experts at BioBridges. Left the audience speechless.

» And it is free of cost, right? [etc. etc.]

Sure. The problem is the ‘regulatory crep’ I suspected in my post. Jiři showed nice simulations about the false positive rate. To squeeze the lower CL ≥50 is not another league but another sport. How many units will we have to test in the future? 24, 48, 96?

Cheers,
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,250 posts in 4,262 threads, 1,398 registered users;
online 21 (0 registered, 21 guests [including 10 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 15:52 CET

No written law has ever been more binding than
unwritten custom supported by popular opinion.    Carrie Chapman Catt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5