Ahem – number of units? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-06 20:14 (1604 d 22:10 ago) – Posting: # 20670
Views: 5,245

Hi ElMaestro,

❝ ❝ […] Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria are met?


❝ I think yours is the right interpretation.


Was also the opinion of some experts at BioBridges. Left the audience speechless.

❝ And it is free of cost, right? [etc. etc.]



Sure. The problem is the ‘regulatory crep’ I suspected in my post. Jiři showed nice simulations about the false positive rate. To squeeze the lower CL ≥50 is not another league but another sport. How many units will we have to test in the future? 24, 48, 96?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖🏼 Довге життя Україна! [image]
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,912 posts in 4,806 threads, 1,636 registered users;
29 visitors (0 registered, 29 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 17:25 CET (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5