Ahem – number of units? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-10-06 18:14 (379 d 07:37 ago) – Posting: # 20670
Views: 2,125

Hi ElMaestro,

» » […] Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria are met?
» I think yours is the right interpretation.

Was also the opinion of some experts at BioBridges. Left the audience speechless.

» And it is free of cost, right? [etc. etc.]

Sure. The problem is the ‘regulatory crep’ I suspected in my post. Jiři showed nice simulations about the false positive rate. To squeeze the lower CL ≥50 is not another league but another sport. How many units will we have to test in the future? 24, 48, 96?

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,162 posts in 4,410 threads, 1,476 registered users;
online 12 (0 registered, 12 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 01:52 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz