Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-10-06 19:54 (1450 d 15:16 ago) – Posting: # 20668
Views: 4,870

Hi Hötzi,

❝ Do I get this right? Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria* are met?

I think yours is the right interpretation.
And it is free of cost, right? You have free software to do the calculation albeit the validation steps may be a bit cumbersome if you decide to go for that. It is quite uncomplicated: once you have your dissolution datasets you do the f2 and you do some bootstapping with one extra click, wait a few minutes or hours (or just split seconds if you are using my software, made in C of course) and Bob's your uncle.

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,759 posts in 4,775 threads, 1,628 registered users;
19 visitors (0 registered, 19 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: 11:10 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Whenever a theory appears to you as the only possible one,
take this as a sign that you have neither understood the theory
nor the problem which it was intended to solve.    Karl R. Popper

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz