Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum • Is ƒ2 dead as well

Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by ElMaestro – Belgium?, 2019-10-06 17:54 (416 d 06:16 ago) – Posting: # 20668
Views: 2,161

Hi Hötzi,

» Do I get this right? Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ₂ even if the validity criteria* are met?

I think yours is the right interpretation.
And it is free of cost, right? You have free software to do the calculation albeit the validation steps may be a bit cumbersome if you decide to go for that. It is quite uncomplicated: once you have your dissolution datasets you do the f2 and you do some bootstapping with one extra click, wait a few minutes or hours (or just split seconds if you are using my software, made in C of course) and Bob's your uncle.

—
I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

No, of course you do not need to audit your CRO if it was inspected in 1968 by the agency of Crabongostan.

Complete thread:

EMA: Mahalanobis distance is dead... Helmut 2018-11-09 18:01 [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]
- EMA: Mahalanobis distance is dead... ElMaestro 2018-11-09 19:12
  - Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping? Helmut 2019-10-06 15:27
    - Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping?ElMaestro 2019-10-06 17:54
      - Ahem – number of units? Helmut 2019-10-06 18:14
        
        Ahem – number of units? ElMaestro 2019-10-06 22:45
        
        Ahem – number of units? wienui 2019-10-07 19:11