Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-10-06 17:54 (720 d 14:53 ago) – Posting: # 20668
Views: 3,057

Hi Hötzi,

» Do I get this right? Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria* are met?

I think yours is the right interpretation.
And it is free of cost, right? You have free software to do the calculation albeit the validation steps may be a bit cumbersome if you decide to go for that. It is quite uncomplicated: once you have your dissolution datasets you do the f2 and you do some bootstapping with one extra click, wait a few minutes or hours (or just split seconds if you are using my software, made in C of course) and Bob's your uncle.

Pass or fail!
ElMaestro

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,700 posts in 4,538 threads, 1,542 registered users;
online 14 (1 registered, 13 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 08:47 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5