Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by ElMaestro  – Belgium?, 2019-10-06 17:54 (379 d 13:33 ago) – Posting: # 20668
Views: 2,101

Hi Hötzi,

» Do I get this right? Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria* are met?

I think yours is the right interpretation.
And it is free of cost, right? You have free software to do the calculation albeit the validation steps may be a bit cumbersome if you decide to go for that. It is quite uncomplicated: once you have your dissolution datasets you do the f2 and you do some bootstapping with one extra click, wait a few minutes or hours (or just split seconds if you are using my software, made in C of course) and Bob's your uncle.

I could be wrong, but...

Best regards,
ElMaestro

R's base package has 274 reserved words and operators, along with 1761 functions. I can use 18 of them (about 14 of them properly). I believe this makes me the Donald Trump of programming.

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,164 posts in 4,410 threads, 1,476 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 07:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
But, in practice, there is.    Jan L.A. van de Snepscheut

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5