Is ƒ2 dead as well – always bootstrapping? [Dissolution / BCS / IVIVC]

posted by ElMaestro  – Denmark, 2019-10-06 17:54 (559 d 07:03 ago) – Posting: # 20668
Views: 2,541

Hi Hötzi,

» Do I get this right? Bootstrapping is preferred over ƒ2 even if the validity criteria* are met?

I think yours is the right interpretation.
And it is free of cost, right? You have free software to do the calculation albeit the validation steps may be a bit cumbersome if you decide to go for that. It is quite uncomplicated: once you have your dissolution datasets you do the f2 and you do some bootstapping with one extra click, wait a few minutes or hours (or just split seconds if you are using my software, made in C of course) and Bob's your uncle.

Pass or fail!

Complete thread:

 Admin contact
21,419 posts in 4,475 threads, 1,511 registered users;
online 16 (0 registered, 16 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Sunday 00:57 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Nothing fails like success because you do not learn anything from it.
The only thing we ever learn from is failure.
Success only confirms our superstitions.    Kenneth E. Boulding

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz