Two 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover design [Design Issues]

posted by qzhou – China, 2019-09-24 04:20  – Posting: # 20643
Views: 792

Dear Helmut,

Regarding 6x3 crossover design (with one treatment T and two references R1 and R2), I learned that “Two‐at‐a‐Time Principle” is superior most of time than Pooled ANOVA. Would you evaluate the advantages of two independent 2x2 trials (T vs. R1 and T vs. R2) over the 6x3 crossover design? Actually I have completed the two 2x2 trials. However, someone has challenged me for not conducting it as in 6x3 crossover. Could you please help?

Many thanks,

Bing

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,250 posts in 4,262 threads, 1,398 registered users;
online 25 (0 registered, 25 guests [including 11 identified bots]).
Forum time (Europe/Vienna): 18:54 CET

No written law has ever been more binding than
unwritten custom supported by popular opinion.    Carrie Chapman Catt

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5