Two 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover design [Design Issues]

posted by qzhou – China, 2019-09-24 04:20 (396 d 09:50 ago) – Posting: # 20643
Views: 1,722

Dear Helmut,

Regarding 6x3 crossover design (with one treatment T and two references R1 and R2), I learned that “Two‐at‐a‐Time Principle” is superior most of time than Pooled ANOVA. Would you evaluate the advantages of two independent 2x2 trials (T vs. R1 and T vs. R2) over the 6x3 crossover design? Actually I have completed the two 2x2 trials. However, someone has challenged me for not conducting it as in 6x3 crossover. Could you please help?

Many thanks,

Bing

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,179 posts in 4,414 threads, 1,474 registered users;
online 8 (0 registered, 8 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 14:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

It is the peculiar and perpetual error of the human understanding
to be more moved and excited by affirmatives than negatives.    Francis Bacon

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5