Two 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover design [Design Issues]

posted by qzhou – China, 2019-09-24 04:20 (369 d 20:53 ago) – Posting: # 20643
Views: 1,674

Dear Helmut,

Regarding 6x3 crossover design (with one treatment T and two references R1 and R2), I learned that “Two‐at‐a‐Time Principle” is superior most of time than Pooled ANOVA. Would you evaluate the advantages of two independent 2x2 trials (T vs. R1 and T vs. R2) over the 6x3 crossover design? Actually I have completed the two 2x2 trials. However, someone has challenged me for not conducting it as in 6x3 crossover. Could you please help?

Many thanks,

Bing

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,079 posts in 4,396 threads, 1,468 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Monday 01:14 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

A central lesson of science is that to understand complex issues
(or even simple ones), we must try to free our minds of dogma and
to guarantee the freedom to publish, to contradict, and to experiment.
Arguments from authority are unacceptable.    Carl Sagan

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5