Log in
RegisterTwo 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover design [Design Issues]
Dear Helmut,
Regarding 6x3 crossover design （with one treatment T and two references R1 and R2）, I learned that “Two‐at‐a‐Time Principle” is superior most of time than Pooled ANOVA. Would you evaluate the advantages of two independent 2x2 trials (T vs. R1 and T vs. R2) over the 6x3 crossover design? Actually I have completed the two 2x2 trials. However, someone has challenged me for not conducting it as in 6x3 crossover. Could you please help?
Many thanks,
Bing
Regarding 6x3 crossover design （with one treatment T and two references R1 and R2）, I learned that “Two‐at‐a‐Time Principle” is superior most of time than Pooled ANOVA. Would you evaluate the advantages of two independent 2x2 trials (T vs. R1 and T vs. R2) over the 6x3 crossover design? Actually I have completed the two 2x2 trials. However, someone has challenged me for not conducting it as in 6x3 crossover. Could you please help?
Many thanks,
Bing
Complete thread:
- Two 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover designqzhou 2019-09-24 04:20 [Design Issues]
![[Mix]](https://static.bebac.at/img/mix.png "open in Mix view")
- Two 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover design Helmut 2019-09-24 10:57
Ing. Helmut Schütz