Two 2x2 and one 6x3 crossover design [Design Issues]

posted by qzhou – China, 2019-09-24 02:20  – Posting: # 20643
Views: 1,311

Dear Helmut,

Regarding 6x3 crossover design (with one treatment T and two references R1 and R2), I learned that “Two‐at‐a‐Time Principle” is superior most of time than Pooled ANOVA. Would you evaluate the advantages of two independent 2x2 trials (T vs. R1 and T vs. R2) over the 6x3 crossover design? Actually I have completed the two 2x2 trials. However, someone has challenged me for not conducting it as in 6x3 crossover. Could you please help?

Many thanks,

Bing

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,810 posts in 4,355 threads, 1,447 registered users;
online 10 (0 registered, 10 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 03:01 UTC (Europe/Vienna)

One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown
is the belief that one’s work is terribly important.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5