Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by dshah  – India/United Kingdom, 2019-09-20 09:52 (1167 d 10:48 ago) – Posting: # 20629
Views: 5,047

Dear All!
Thanks for the discussion!

❝ Now you confused me (even reading Ravuri’s OP again did not help). If periods are analyzed in single, separate batches it should not matter in a crossover due to the randomization. Prerequisite: Always keep the order of the batches for all subjects p1 → p2 → …


❝ What would not work:


I believe that ultimately separate batches in a run is not an issue. Over here the calibration curve equation used will be the same. But when we are running P1 and P2 in different run (not batches), then definitely it could have direct impact on BE Out come.

Regards,
D Shah

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,418 posts in 4,693 threads, 1,598 registered users;
8 visitors (0 registered, 8 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: 19:41 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Intellect distinguishes between the possible and the impossible;
reason distinguishes between the sensible and the senseless.
Even the possible can be senseless.    Max Born

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5