Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by dshah  – India/United Kingdom, 2019-09-20 07:52 (1015 d 18:12 ago) – Posting: # 20629
Views: 4,909

Dear All!
Thanks for the discussion!

» Now you confused me (even reading Ravuri’s OP again did not help). If periods are analyzed in single, separate batches it should not matter in a crossover due to the randomization. Prerequisite: Always keep the order of the batches for all subjects p1 → p2 → …
»
» What would not work:
  • A paired design.
    »
  • Periods split into different batches.

I believe that ultimately separate batches in a run is not an issue. Over here the calibration curve equation used will be the same. But when we are running P1 and P2 in different run (not batches), then definitely it could have direct impact on BE Out come.

Regards,
D Shah

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,181 posts in 4,647 threads, 1,572 registered users;
online 5 (0 registered, 5 guests [including 5 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 02:05 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Reach for the stars,
even if you have to stand on a cactus.    Susan Longacre

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5