Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-09-19 15:50 (1104 d 17:28 ago) – Posting: # 20620
Views: 5,102

Dear Helmut,

» However, if Ravuri would have different responses in his approach, they would show up in the ANOVA as a period effect – which is automatically corrected for and thus not relevant in assessing the treatment effect.

Would they really ? I would say yes if he had systematically a negative bias for period 1 and a positive bias for period 2, or vice-versa. As there will not be a single run for Period 1 samples and a single run for period 2 samples, that will not necessarily be the case: some subjects will get artificially a positive bias in P1, others in P2.


Complete thread:

UA Flag
 Admin contact
22,391 posts in 4,685 threads, 1,595 registered users;
online 4 (0 registered, 4 guests [including 2 identified bots]).
Forum time: Wednesday 09:18 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

The real struggle is not between the right and the left
but between the party of the thoughtful
and the party of the jerks.    Jimmy Wales

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz