Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-09-19 15:50 (634 d 14:41 ago) – Posting: # 20620
Views: 4,480

Dear Helmut,

» However, if Ravuri would have different responses in his approach, they would show up in the ANOVA as a period effect – which is automatically corrected for and thus not relevant in assessing the treatment effect.

Would they really ? I would say yes if he had systematically a negative bias for period 1 and a positive bias for period 2, or vice-versa. As there will not be a single run for Period 1 samples and a single run for period 2 samples, that will not necessarily be the case: some subjects will get artificially a positive bias in P1, others in P2.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,518 posts in 4,498 threads, 1,524 registered users;
online 9 (0 registered, 9 guests [including 8 identified bots]).
Forum time: Tuesday 06:31 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

I suppose it is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer,
to treat everything as if it were a nail.    Abraham Maslow

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5