Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-09-19 17:50 (1673 d 05:20 ago) – Posting: # 20620
Views: 5,914

Dear Helmut,

❝ However, if Ravuri would have different responses in his approach, they would show up in the ANOVA as a period effect – which is automatically corrected for and thus not relevant in assessing the treatment effect.


Would they really ? I would say yes if he had systematically a negative bias for period 1 and a positive bias for period 2, or vice-versa. As there will not be a single run for Period 1 samples and a single run for period 2 samples, that will not necessarily be the case: some subjects will get artificially a positive bias in P1, others in P2.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
22,986 posts in 4,823 threads, 1,668 registered users;
49 visitors (0 registered, 49 guests [including 6 identified bots]).
Forum time: 23:11 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Art is “I”; science is “we”.    Claude Bernard

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5