Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-09-19 15:50 (729 d 00:18 ago) – Posting: # 20620
Views: 4,592

Dear Helmut,

» However, if Ravuri would have different responses in his approach, they would show up in the ANOVA as a period effect – which is automatically corrected for and thus not relevant in assessing the treatment effect.

Would they really ? I would say yes if he had systematically a negative bias for period 1 and a positive bias for period 2, or vice-versa. As there will not be a single run for Period 1 samples and a single run for period 2 samples, that will not necessarily be the case: some subjects will get artificially a positive bias in P1, others in P2.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,684 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 7 (0 registered, 7 guests [including 4 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 16:08 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Genius is that which forces
the inertia of humanity to learn.    Henri Bergson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5