Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-09-19 15:50 (434 d 21:42 ago) – Posting: # 20620
Views: 3,816

Dear Helmut,

» However, if Ravuri would have different responses in his approach, they would show up in the ANOVA as a period effect – which is automatically corrected for and thus not relevant in assessing the treatment effect.

Would they really ? I would say yes if he had systematically a negative bias for period 1 and a positive bias for period 2, or vice-versa. As there will not be a single run for Period 1 samples and a single run for period 2 samples, that will not necessarily be the case: some subjects will get artificially a positive bias in P1, others in P2.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,213 posts in 4,426 threads, 1,481 registered users;
online 24 (0 registered, 24 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 12:33 CET (Europe/Vienna)

Biostatistician. One who has neither the intellect for mathematics
nor the commitment for medicine but likes to dabble in both.    Stephen Senn

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5