Leads to a (pseudo-) period effect ? [Bioanalytics]

posted by Ohlbe – France, 2019-09-19 15:50  – Posting: # 20620
Views: 2,966

Dear Helmut,

» However, if Ravuri would have different responses in his approach, they would show up in the ANOVA as a period effect – which is automatically corrected for and thus not relevant in assessing the treatment effect.

Would they really ? I would say yes if he had systematically a negative bias for period 1 and a positive bias for period 2, or vice-versa. As there will not be a single run for Period 1 samples and a single run for period 2 samples, that will not necessarily be the case: some subjects will get artificially a positive bias in P1, others in P2.

Regards
Ohlbe

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,810 posts in 4,355 threads, 1,447 registered users;
online 18 (0 registered, 18 guests [including 13 identified bots]).
Forum time: 05:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown
is the belief that one’s work is terribly important.    Bertrand Russell

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5