Hybrid B/C [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Helmut Homepage – Vienna, Austria, 2019-09-18 17:09 (324 d 00:18 ago) – Posting: # 20612
Views: 3,712

Dear Mikalai,

» What prevents us from evaluating the bioequivalence at α-level of 5% as the first step, and if we pass the bioequivalence criteria, we stop the trial. If we fail, we then evaluate the power. If power is more than 80% for the failed parameter, we stop the trial and we are done. If power is less than 80% for the failed parameter, then we go the next stage and adust α-level correspondingly to preserve overall α-level at 0,5. Of course, this should be written in the protocol and is a deviation, maybe a big one, from Potvin C method.

That’s more or less a hybrid of Method C (where you asses power first) and Method B (where you assess power after). You are free to develop such a method but have to validate it (i.e., find a suitable adjusted α which controls the type I error in every possible combination of n1/CV).

Dif-tor heh smusma 🖖
Helmut Schütz
[image]

The quality of responses received is directly proportional to the quality of the question asked. 🚮
Science Quotes

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
20,977 posts in 4,374 threads, 1,460 registered users;
online 24 (1 registered, 23 guests [including 14 identified bots]).
Forum time: Friday 17:27 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

When someone says his conclusions are objective,
he means that they are based on prejudices
which many other people share.    Celia Green

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5