n2 based on PK metric with higher CV [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Elena777 – Belarus, 2019-09-16 19:48 (732 d 05:33 ago) – Posting: # 20601
Views: 5,962

Dear Helmut,

Still need some clarifications on the question from Astea:

» a) first step - estimated power is less than target (80%) for Cmax and more than target for AUC, besides 90%CI for AUC is OK.

To be in compliance with method C of Potvin, we re-calculate CI for Cmax with α=0,0294. Let`s assume that BE criterion for Cmax is met after this step. Should we also re-calculate CI for AUC with α=0,0294? Otherwise, finally we will have the following in a CSR: BE criterion was met for AUC using α=0,05 (90%CI) and BE criterion was met for Cmax using α=0,0294 (94,12% CI). Does it look OK?

Complete thread:

Activity
 Admin contact
21,689 posts in 4,534 threads, 1,541 registered users;
online 2 (0 registered, 2 guests [including 1 identified bots]).
Forum time: Saturday 01:21 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Old beliefs die hard
even when demonstrably false.    E. O. Wilson

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5