n2 based on PK metric with higher CV [Two-Stage / GS Designs]

posted by Elena777 – Belarus, 2019-09-16 21:48 (1762 d 07:02 ago) – Posting: # 20601
Views: 9,430

Dear Helmut,

Still need some clarifications on the question from Astea:

❝ a) first step - estimated power is less than target (80%) for Cmax and more than target for AUC, besides 90%CI for AUC is OK.


To be in compliance with method C of Potvin, we re-calculate CI for Cmax with α=0,0294. Let`s assume that BE criterion for Cmax is met after this step. Should we also re-calculate CI for AUC with α=0,0294? Otherwise, finally we will have the following in a CSR: BE criterion was met for AUC using α=0,05 (90%CI) and BE criterion was met for Cmax using α=0,0294 (94,12% CI). Does it look OK?

Complete thread:

UA Flag
Activity
 Admin contact
23,099 posts in 4,857 threads, 1,646 registered users;
113 visitors (0 registered, 113 guests [including 12 identified bots]).
Forum time: 04:51 CEST (Europe/Vienna)

Genius is one per cent inspiration and ninety-nine per cent perspiration.
Accordingly, a ‘genius’ is often merely a talented person
who has done all of his or her homework.    Thomas Alva Edison

The Bioequivalence and Bioavailability Forum is hosted by
BEBAC Ing. Helmut Schütz
HTML5